Technical University of Denmark
Browse
DOCUMENT
movia_5_NONE_3_MINIMPROV.pdf (133.72 kB)
DOCUMENT
movia_5_NONE_INF_LINEAR.pdf (139.07 kB)
DOCUMENT
movia_5_NONE_INF_MINIMPROV.pdf (133.68 kB)
DOCUMENT
movia_5_PASS_1_LINEAR.pdf (135.83 kB)
DOCUMENT
movia_5_PASS_1_MINIMPROV.pdf (127.62 kB)
DOCUMENT
movia_5_PASS_2_LINEAR.pdf (138.92 kB)
DOCUMENT
movia_5_PASS_2_MINIMPROV.pdf (131.5 kB)
DOCUMENT
movia_5_PASS_3_LINEAR.pdf (139 kB)
DOCUMENT
movia_5_PASS_3_MINIMPROV.pdf (132.48 kB)
DOCUMENT
movia_5_PASS_INF_LINEAR.pdf (139.03 kB)
DOCUMENT
movia_5_PASS_INF_MINIMPROV.pdf (132.92 kB)
DOCUMENT
movia_4_COST_1_LINEAR.pdf (141.51 kB)
DOCUMENT
movia_4_COST_1_MINIMPROV.pdf (130.61 kB)
DOCUMENT
movia_4_COST_2_LINEAR.pdf (141.56 kB)
DOCUMENT
movia_4_COST_2_MINIMPROV.pdf (132.7 kB)
DOCUMENT
movia_4_COST_3_LINEAR.pdf (141.58 kB)
DOCUMENT
movia_4_COST_3_MINIMPROV.pdf (133.67 kB)
DOCUMENT
movia_4_COST_INF_LINEAR.pdf (141.64 kB)
DOCUMENT
movia_4_COST_INF_MINIMPROV.pdf (134.58 kB)
DOCUMENT
movia_4_NONE_1_LINEAR.pdf (141.58 kB)
1/0
120 files

Solution plots for the case study instances in the paper "The Bus Rapid Transit Investment Problem"

figure
posted on 2023-10-02, 13:10 authored by Rowan HoogervorstRowan Hoogervorst, Evelien van der HurkEvelien van der Hurk, Philine Schiewe, Anita Schöbel, Reena Urban

Solution plots for the case study instances in the paper "The Bus Rapid Transit Investment Problem".

Instance Naming

The naming of the files uses the pattern "movia_[ROUTE]_[BETA]_[Z]_[OBJECTIVE].xml", where ROUTE, BETA, Z, and OBJECTIVE correspond to the concerned route alternative, budget split, the number of allowed BRT components and the passenger response applied in the objective, respectively.

Explanation of Plots

For the setting determined by the instance name, the upgraded segments are displayed for certain investment budgets. Here, 100% investment budget corresponds to the costs of upgrading all segments of the most expensive line alternative. The set of nondominated points is condensed to ten budget ranges and shows the solution with the highest number of newly attracted passengers within each range. Segments are colored according to the corresponding municipalities if they are upgraded and are gray if they are not upgraded. The shade of the color displays the share of the passengers using the segment compared to the total number of potential passengers. The width of a segment corresponds to its costs. The load profile for the completely upgraded BRT line is given at the top. The investment costs and the attracted passengers are normalized by the costs of upgrading all segments of the most expensive line alternative and the highest number of attracted passengers over all line alternatives, respectively.

This item is part of the Collection: https://doi.org/10.11583/DTU.c.6805470.


Funding

Urban Accessibility and Connectivity

European Commission

Find out more...

Joint project: EASIER - Sustainable Urban Mobility - Subproject Efficient Tariff Systems

Federal Ministry of Education and Research

Find out more...

History

ORCID for corresponding depositor

Usage metrics

    DTU Management

    Licence

    Exports

    RefWorks
    BibTeX
    Ref. manager
    Endnote
    DataCite
    NLM
    DC